The case in opposition to the criminalization of doping

  • Alldridge P (1993) Intercourse, lies and the prison regulation. North Irel Leg Q 44(3):250–268


    Google Scholar
     

  • Anderson J (2013) Doping, sport and the regulation: time for repeal of prohibition? Int J Legislation Context 9(2):135–159

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Anderson J (2016) The juridification and criminalisation of doping: time to revive the spirit of sport? In: Healey D, Haas U (eds) Doping in sport and the regulation. Hart Publishing, Oxford, pp 251–268


    Google Scholar
     

  • Ashworth A (2000) Is the prison regulation a misplaced trigger? Legislation Q Rev 116(2):225–256


    Google Scholar
     

  • Ashworth A, Zedner L (2010) Preventive orders: an issue of undercriminalization? In: Duff RA, Farmer L, Marshall SE, Renzo M, Tadros V (eds) The boundaries of prison regulation. Oxford College Press, Oxford, pp 59–87

    Chapter 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Backhouse S et al (2014) Research on doping prevention: a map of authorized, regulatory and prevention apply provisions in EU 28. Publications Workplace of the European Union, Luxembourg. https://doi.org/10.2766/86776. Accessed 1 Mar 2021

  • Baird LC, Newman CB, Volk H, Svinth JR, Conklin J, Levy ML (2010) Mortality ensuing from head harm in skilled boxing. Neurosurgery 67(5):1444–1450. https://doi.org/10.1227/01.neu.0000373207.04297.13

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Baker D (2011) The appropriate to not be criminalized: demarcating prison regulation’s authority. Ashgate Publishing, London


    Google Scholar
     

  • Batt A (2011) The position of UK anti-doping within the battle in opposition to doping in sport. Int J Sport Coverage Polit 3(2):261–270. https://doi.org/10.1080/19406940.2011.577794

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Buechel B, Emrich E, Pohlkamp S (2016) No person’s harmless. J Sports activities Econ 17(8):767–789. https://doi.org/10.1177/1527002514551475

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Chappelet J (2021) The governance of the Courtroom of Arbitration for Sport. In: Chatziefstathiou D, García B, Séguin B (eds) Routledge handbook of the Olympic and Paralympic video games. Routledge, New York, pp 309–320


    Google Scholar
     

  • Cisneros B (2020) Difficult the decision: ought to sports activities governing our bodies be topic to judicial evaluation? Int Sports activities Legislation J 20(1):18–35. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40318-020-00165-9

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Cisyk J, Courty P (2017) Do followers care about compliance to doping laws in sports activities? The affect of PED suspension in baseball. J Sports activities Econ 18(4):323–350. https://doi.org/10.1177/1527002515587441

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Collins R (2005) Altering the sport: the congressional response to sports activities doping by way of the anabolic steroid management act. N Engl Legislation Rev 40(3):753–764


    Google Scholar
     

  • Corlett J (2013) Doping: simply do it? Sport Eth Philos 7(4):430–449. https://doi.org/10.1080/17511321.2013.851731

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Danylchuk Ok, Stegink J, Lebel Ok (2016) Doping scandals in skilled biking: affect on main staff sponsor’s inventory return. Int J Sports activities Mark Spons 17(1):37–55. https://doi.org/10.1108/ijsms-02-2016-003

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • David P (2008) A information to the world anti-doping code. Cambridge College Press, Cambridge

    Book 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Devine JW (2010) Doping is a menace to sporting excellence. Br J Sports activities Med 45(8):637–639. https://doi.org/10.1136/bjsm.2009.070862

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Duff RA (2018) The realm of prison regulation. Oxford College Press, Oxford

    Book 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Duff RA, Farmer L, Marshall SE, Renzo M, Tadros V (2014) Introduction: in the direction of a idea of criminalization? In: Duff RA, Farmer L, Marshall SE, Renzo M, Tadros V (eds) Criminalization: the political morality of the prison regulation. Oxford College Press, Oxford, pp 1–53

    Chapter 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Engelberg T, Moston S, Skinner J (2012) Public notion of sport anti-doping coverage in Australia. Medication Educ Prev Coverage 19(1):84–87

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Exner J (2018) Anti-doping and athletes’ rights underneath EU regulation: four-year interval of ineligibility as disproportionate sanction? Int Sports activities Legislation J 17(3–4):128–138. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40318-018-0119-x

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Fainaru-Wada M, Williams L (2006) Recreation of shadows: Barry Bonds, BALCO, and the steroids scandal that rocked skilled sports activities. Penguin Group, New York


    Google Scholar
     

  • Fitzgerald T (2018) Doping in sport-should it’s against the law? Sports activities Legislation eJ 1(1):1–17


    Google Scholar
     

  • Goldstein AM, Morse SJ, Packer IK (2013) Analysis of prison duty. In: Otto RK, Weiner I (eds) Handbook of psychology, 2nd edn. Wiley, New York, pp 440–472


    Google Scholar
     

  • Goldsworthy D (2018) Athletes’ rights underneath the world anti-doping code: a official public curiosity? Altern Legislation J 43(3):197–202. https://doi.org/10.1177/1037969X18783292

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Inexperienced SP (2006) Mendacity, dishonest, and stealing: an ethical idea of white-collar crime. Oxford College Press, Oxford


    Google Scholar
     

  • Healey D (2016) The parable of the extent enjoying discipline in sport. In: Healey D, Haas U (eds) Doping in sport and the regulation. Hart Publishing, Oxford, pp 3–18


    Google Scholar
     

  • HM Authorities, Division for Digital, Media, Tradition and Sport (2017) Evaluate of criminalisation of doping in sport. https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/654240/Review_of_Criminalisation_of_Doping_in_Sport.pdf. Accessed 5 Mar 2021

  • Hoberman J (2005) Testosterone goals: rejuvenation, aphrodisia, doping. College of California Press, London

    Book 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Hoberman J (2011) ‘Athletes in handcuffs?’ The criminalization of doping. In: McNamee M, Møller V (eds) Doping and anti-doping coverage in sport: moral, authorized and social views. Routledge, New York, pp 99–110


    Google Scholar
     

  • Holm S (2007) Doping underneath medical management – conceptually attainable however not possible on the earth {of professional} sports activities? Sport Ethics Philos 1(2):135–145. https://doi.org/10.1080/17511320701425116

  • Houlihan B (2002) Dying to win: doping in sport and the event of anti-doping coverage. Council of Europe Press, Strasbourg


    Google Scholar
     

  • Hoye R, Smith AC, Nicholson M, Stewart B (2015) Sport administration: rules and functions. Routledge, New York

    Book 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Husak D (2004) Weapons and medicines: case research on the principled limits of the prison sanction. Legislation Philos 23(5):437–493


    Google Scholar
     

  • Husak D (2008) Overcriminalization: the boundaries of the prison regulation. Oxford College Press, Oxford


    Google Scholar
     

  • Husak D, de Marneffe P (2005) The legalization of medication (for and in opposition to). Cambridge College Press, New York

    Book 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Ioannidis G (2010) The appliance of prison regulation on doping infractions and the ‘whereabouts info’ rule: state regulation v self-regulation. Int Sports activities Legislation 1:14–25


    Google Scholar
     

  • Ioannidis G (2017) The criminalisation of doping in sport: the case for the prosecution. World Sport Advocate 16(3–4):12–14


    Google Scholar
     

  • Jacobs AJ (2011) Is state energy to guard well being appropriate with substantive due course of rights? Ann Well being Legislation 20(1):113–149


    Google Scholar
     

  • Karlin S (2017) Germany’s anti-doping laws. World Sports activities Advocate 5:8–9


    Google Scholar
     

  • Kayser B, Mauron A, Miah A (2007) Present anti-doping coverage: a crucial appraisal. BMC Med Ethics 8(2):1–10. https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6939-8-2

  • Kayser B, De Block A (2020) Would rest of the anti-doping rule result in crimson queen results? Sport Eth Philos 15(3):1–15


    Google Scholar
     

  • Kedzoir M (2012) Criminalization of commerce and trafficking in doping substances within the European Union. Int Sports activities Legislation J 1–2:20–25


    Google Scholar
     

  • Kornbeck J, Kayser B (2018) Do public notion and the ‘spirit of sport’ justify the criminalisation of doping? A reply to Claire Sumner. Int Sports activities Legislation J 18(1–2):61–78. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40318-018-0120-4

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Latiner C (2006) Steroids and drug enhancements in sports activities: the actual drawback and the actual resolution. DePaul J Sports activities Legislation Contemp Probl 3(2):192–219


    Google Scholar
     

  • Legislation Fee (2010) Prison legal responsibility in regulatory contexts: a session paper No. 195. The Stationery Workplace, London


    Google Scholar
     

  • Lindholm J (2013) Does legislating in opposition to doping in sports activities make sense? Evaluating Sweden and the U.S. suggests not. Va Sports activities Entertain Legislation J 13(1):21–34


    Google Scholar
     

  • Loland S (2002) Honest play in sport: an ethical norm system. Routledge, London


    Google Scholar
     

  • López B (2013) Creating concern: the ‘doping deaths’, threat communication and the anti-doping marketing campaign. Int J Sport Coverage Polit 6(2):213–225. https://doi.org/10.1080/19406940.2013.773359

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Lowther J (2015) Does criminalizing doping ship? In: Møller V, Waddington I, Hoberman J (eds) Routledge handbook of medication and sport. Routledge, New York, pp 337–349

    Chapter 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Luna E (2004) Overextending the prison regulation. In: Healy G (ed) Go on to jail: the criminalization of virtually all the pieces. Cato Institute, Washington, D.C., pp 1–8


    Google Scholar
     

  • Mavromatis A, Gargalianos D (2007) Sport crimes in Greece: the safety of sport by the Greek penal regulation. Entertain Sports activities Legislation J 5(2):xxix–xxxiii


    Google Scholar
     

  • Mckenzie C (2007) Using prison justice mechanisms to fight doping in sport. Sports activities Legislation eJ 1(1):6391


    Google Scholar
     

  • McNamee MJ, Tarasti L (2010) Juridical and moral peculiarities in doping coverage. J Med Eth 36(3):165–169. https://doi.org/10.1136/jme.2009.030023

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Melethil S (2006) Well being regulation symposium: making the prohibited listing: present me the information. St. Louis Univ Legislation J 75(1):75–90


    Google Scholar
     

  • Miah A (2004) Genetically modified athletes: biomedical ethics, gene doping and sport. Routledge, New York

    Book 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Møller V (2005) Knud Enemark Jensen’s loss of life throughout the 1960 Rome Olympics: a seek for fact? Sport Hist 25(3):452–471. https://doi.org/10.1080/17460260500396319

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Møller V (2008) The doping satan. Books on Demand, Norderstedt


    Google Scholar
     

  • Møller V (2010) The ethics of doping and anti-doping. Routledge, New York


    Google Scholar
     

  • Moston S, Engelberg T (2017) Detecting doping in sport. Taylor & Francis, New York


    Google Scholar
     

  • Murray T (2019) What’s the purpose of sport? Int J Sport Coverage Polit 11(2):355–364

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Nadelmann E (1989) Drug prohibition in america: prices, penalties, and alternate options. Science 245(4921):939–947

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Negro M, Marzullo N, Caso F, Calanni L, D’Antonna G (2018) Opinion paper: scientific, philosophical and authorized consideration of doping in sports activities. Eur J Appl Physiol 118(4):729–736. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00421-018-3821-3

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Nightingale B (1996) The regulation of fraud and associated offences. Carswell Publishing, Toronto


    Google Scholar
     

  • Petersen T (2021) Doping in sport: a defence. Routledge, New York


    Google Scholar
     

  • Posner RA (2008) In protection of Prometheus: some moral, financial, and regulatory problems with sports activities doping. Duke Legislation J 57:1725–1741


    Google Scholar
     

  • Preston I, Szymanski S (2003) Dishonest in contests. Oxf Rev Econ Coverage 19:612–624

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Reuter P (2009) The unintended penalties of drug insurance policies. Trimbos Institute, Utrecht


    Google Scholar
     

  • Savulescu J, Foddy B, Clayton M (2004) Why we should always enable efficiency enhancing medicine in sport. Br J Sports activities Med 38(6):666–670. https://doi.org/10.1136/bjsm.2003.005249

  • Schneider A, Butcher R (2000) A philosophical overview of the arguments on banning doping in sport. In: Tännsjö T, Tamburrini C (eds) Values in sport: elitism, nationalism, gender equality and the scientific manufacture of winners. Taylor & Francis, London, pp 185–199


    Google Scholar
     

  • Schonsheck J (1994) On criminalization: an essay within the philosophy of the prison regulation. Kluwer Tutorial Publishers, Dordrecht

    Book 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Simester AP, von Hirsch A (2011) Crimes, harms and wrongs: on the rules of criminalisation. Hart Publishing, Oxford


    Google Scholar
     

  • Sloot VB, Paun M, Leenes R (2020) Athletes’ human rights and the battle in opposition to doping: a research of the European authorized framework. T.M.C. Asser Press, The Hague

    Book 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Smith A, Stewart B (2008) Drug coverage in sport: hidden assumptions and inherent contradictions. Drug Alcohol Rev 27(2):123–129. https://doi.org/10.1080/09595230701829355

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Soares JAP, Antunes HRL, Bárbara A, Escórcio C, Saldanha P (2016) The general public curiosity of sports activities at non-profit sports activities organizations which are supported by the federal government. Revista Brasileira De Educação Física e Esporte 30:675–688

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Solberg HA, Hanstad DV, Thøring TA (2010) Doping in elite sport-do the followers care? Public opinion on the results of doping scandals. Int J Sports activities Mark Spons 11(3):2–16


    Google Scholar
     

  • Stamm H, Lamprecht M, Kamber M, Marti B, Mahler N (2008) The general public notion of doping in sport in Switzerland, 1995–2004. J Sports activities Sci 26(3):235–242. https://doi.org/10.1080/02640410701552914

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Stevens GP (2013) The winner takes all of it! Reflections on the world anti-doping code and the attainable criminalisation of doping in sport. De Jure 46(2):592–600


    Google Scholar
     

  • Sumner C (2017) The spirit of sport: the case for criminalisation of doping within the UK. Int Sports activities Legislation J 16(3–4):217–227. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40318-016-0103-2

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Tadros V (2010) Criminalization and regulation. In: Duff RA, Farmer L, Marshall SE, Renzo M, Tadros V (eds) The boundaries of prison regulation. Oxford College Press, Oxford, pp 163–190

    Chapter 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Tadros V (2016) Wrongs and crimes. Oxford College Press, Oxford

    Book 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Tamburrini C (2000) What’s improper with doping? In: Tännsjö T, Tamburrini C (eds) Values in sport: elitism, nationalism, gender equality and the scientific manufacture of winners. Taylor & Francis, London, pp 200–216


    Google Scholar
     

  • Teitelbaum S (2010) Athletes who indulge their darkish facet: intercourse, medicine, and cover-ups. Praeger/ABC-CLIO, Santa Barbara


    Google Scholar
     

  • Towan GL (2012) Anti-doping’s braver new world; to criminalisation and past. ANZSLA Remark 84:5–22


    Google Scholar
     

  • Turner C (2014) Tort regulation. Routledge, New York


    Google Scholar
     

  • van Bockel WB (2009) The ne bis in idem precept in EU regulation. A conceptual and jurisprudential evaluation. https://scholarlypublications.universiteitleiden.nl/handle/1887/13844. Accessed 25 Mar 2021

  • Vangrunderbeek H, Tolleneer J (2011) Pupil attitudes in the direction of doping in sport: shifting from repression to tolerance? Int Rev Sociol Sport 46(3):346–357. https://doi.org/10.1177/1012690210380579

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • van Reeth D, Lagae W (2013) Public opinion on doping in biking: variations amongst inhabitants teams. HUBrussel Analysis Paper 2013/14

  • Waddington I (2000) Sport, well being and medicines: a crucial sociological perspective. E&FN Spon, London


    Google Scholar
     

  • Waddington I, Smith A (2009) An introduction to medicine in sport: hooked on profitable? Routledge, New York

    Book 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Weston M (2018) The regulation of doping in U.S. and worldwide sports activities. In: McCann M (ed) The Oxford handbook of American sports activities regulation. Oxford College Press, Oxford, pp 84–110


    Google Scholar
     

  • Whitman J (2008) Profitable in any respect prices: utilizing regulation & economics to find out the correct position of presidency in regulating the usage of performance-enhancing medicine in skilled sports activities. Univ Unwell Legislation Rev 1:459–504


    Google Scholar
     

  • Woodiwiss M (2001) Organised crime and American energy: a historical past. College of Toronto Press, Toronto

    Book 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Wynne C (2019) Politics, coverage and the possession of sport. In: Adams A, Robinson L (eds) Who owns sport? Routledge, New York, pp 59–69


    Google Scholar
     

  • Zaksaite S, Radke H (2014) The interplay of prison and disciplinary regulation in doping-related circumstances. Int Sports activities Legislation J 14(1–2):115–127. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40318-014-0045-5

    Article 

    Google Scholar