HOF: The perfect – by G. Scott Thomas

By 4 months ago

Sure, I admit it. There was a unfavorable solid to my Hall of Fame items the previous few Fridays.

I defined — logically and unemotionally, I hope — why a number of of the corridor’s inductees don’t actually belong in Cooperstown. My targets in latest weeks included Tommy McCarthy, Freddie Lindstrom, 4 managers, Catfish Hunter, a trio of catchers, and Invoice Mazeroski.

There are others on my hit listing, however let’s put them apart for a future Friday. It’s time for a optimistic respite, a rundown of probably the most deserving members of the Corridor of Fame.

I picked 12 stars for this listing (the highest 10, plus ties) through the use of the identical measuring stick that so clearly enumerated the deficiencies of McCarthy, Lindstrom, et al. It’s the standard rating (QS), which is plotted on a 100-point scale.

Anyone with a QS of 60 factors or larger is a digital lock to make it to Cooperstown. The Corridor of Famers on at the moment’s listing soared far above that threshold, as you’ll be able to see:

  • 1. Honus Wagner, 98

  • 2. Rogers Hornsby, 96

  • 2. Walter Johnson, 96

  • 4. Willie Mays, 95

  • 5. Mike Schmidt, 91

  • 6. Ty Cobb, 90

  • 6. Lefty Grove, 90

  • 6. Nap Lajoie, 90

  • 6. Babe Ruth, 90

  • 10. Randy Johnson, 89

  • 10. Mariano Rivera, 89

  • 10. Ted Williams, 89

Solely two gamers in big-league historical past have amassed high quality scores on this elite neighborhood (89 factors or larger) with out being admitted to Cooperstown’s plaque gallery. their names — Barry Bonds and Roger Clemens — and you recognize why they’ve been excluded. We’ll discuss them another time.

At this time’s focus is on the dozen all-time greats who carry the best honor to the Corridor of Fame. There’s no must say a lot about them — I’m positive you’re accustomed to all 12 — or to parse the slight variations of their high quality scores.

I make an exception just for the participant on the very prime of the standings. Lots of chances are you’ll be stunned to see Honus Wagner main the pack, not Babe Ruth or Ty Cobb.

Wagner was chosen as one of many Corridor of Fame’s 5 constitution members, although he didn’t obtain probably the most votes within the 1936 election. That honor went to Cobb, a lot to the displeasure of a few of his contemporaries.

“Cobb! An excellent hitter, a sensational baserunner, and a dynamic persona on the diamond, sure,” stated Jack Meyers, a catcher within the Nationwide League from 1909 to 1917. “However he was a poor outfielder, didn’t possess a very good arm, and was by no means often called a workforce participant.”

And who did Meyers take into account the best participant within the 65-year historical past of major-league baseball? “Previous Honus was a ballplayer’s participant,” Meyers stated in 1936. “He did every thing effectively. We used to marvel at his all-round means. We thought-about him an artist, slightly than only a participant.”

Wagner was unsurpassed in Meyers’s estimation, and he retains that distinction in at the moment’s QS standings, holding a two-point lead over his closest rivals.

Scroll beneath to see a capsule report on every of the 12 Corridor of Fame superstars, together with his main place, profession stats, high quality rating, yr of choice, and share of votes from the Baseball Writers’ Affiliation of America. (The brink for induction, after all, is 75 %.) Gamers are listed so as of their election years.

Learn in regards to the Corridor of Fame’s checkered historical past (and unsure future)

Learn about the book

  • Profession: 1897-1917

  • Major place: SS

  • Profession stats: G 2,794, HR 101, RBI 1,732, BA .328

  • High quality rating: 98 factors (wonderful)

  • Chosen to HOF: 1936

  • BBWAA votes: 95.13%

  • Profession: 1907-1927

  • Major place: P

  • Profession stats: G 802, W-L 417-279, SV 34, ERA 2.17

  • High quality rating: 96 factors (wonderful)

  • Chosen to HOF: 1936

  • BBWAA votes: 83.63%

  • Profession: 1905-1928

  • Major place: CF

  • Profession stats: G 3,034, HR 117, RBI 1,944, BA .366

  • High quality rating: 90 factors (wonderful)

  • Chosen to HOF: 1936

  • BBWAA votes: 98.23%

  • Profession: 1914-1935

  • Major place: RF

  • Profession stats: G 2,503, HR 714, RBI 2,214, BA .342

  • High quality rating: 90 factors (wonderful)

  • Chosen to HOF: 1936

  • BBWAA votes: 95.13%

  • Profession: 1896-1916

  • Major place: 2B

  • Profession stats: G 2,480, HR 82, RBI 1,599, BA .338

  • High quality rating: 90 factors (wonderful)

  • Chosen to HOF: 1937

  • BBWAA votes: 83.58%

  • Profession: 1915-1937

  • Major place: 2B

  • Profession stats: G 2,259, HR 301, RBI 1,584, BA .358

  • High quality rating: 96 factors (wonderful)

  • Chosen to HOF: 1942

  • BBWAA votes: 78.11%

  • Profession: 1925-1941

  • Major place: P

  • Profession stats: G 616, W-L 300-141, SV 54, ERA 3.06

  • High quality rating: 90 factors (wonderful)

  • Chosen to HOF: 1947

  • BBWAA votes: 76.40%

  • Profession: 1939-1960

  • Major place: LF

  • Profession stats: G 2,292, HR 521, RBI 1,839, BA .344

  • High quality rating: 89 factors (wonderful)

  • Chosen to HOF: 1966

  • BBWAA votes: 93.38%

  • Profession: 1948-1973

  • Major place: CF

  • Profession stats: G 3,005, HR 660, RBI 1,909, BA .301

  • High quality rating: 95 factors (wonderful)

  • Chosen to HOF: 1979

  • BBWAA votes: 94.68%

  • Profession: 1972-1989

  • Major place: 3B

  • Profession stats: G 2,404, HR 548, RBI 1,595, BA .267

  • High quality rating: 91 factors (wonderful)

  • Chosen to HOF: 1995

  • BBWAA votes: 96.52%

  • Profession: 1988-2009

  • Major place: P

  • Profession stats: G 618, W-L 303-166, SV 2, ERA 3.29

  • High quality rating: 89 factors (wonderful)

  • Chosen to HOF: 2015

  • BBWAA votes: 97.27%

  • Profession: 1995-2013

  • Major place: P

  • Profession stats: G 1,115, W-L 82-60, SV 652, ERA 2.21

  • High quality rating: 89 factors (wonderful)

  • Chosen to HOF: 2019

  • BBWAA votes: 100.00%

Tags: , ,